Why I’m Striking – the letter I’d like to send to parents

One of the challenges of industrial action is ensuring that the message a group gives is clearly received by the necessary audience. Unfortunately, this is a difficult one for teachers. Firstly, we are generally not in the habit of discussing politics with the parents of the students we teach; much less with the students. Secondly, most Heads – quite reasonably in my opinion – don’t wish to engage with political and industrial issues through the school newsletter other than with the necessary facts. Since teachers are unlikely to start leafleting outside the school gates (although the thought had crossed my mind!), it means that the message parents receive is usually simply that teachers are striking.

So here, addressed to no parents in particularly, is the message I’d like to convey.

Dear Parents,

It is with great regret that I am writing to inform you of my absence from school this week due to industrial action. I realise that this causes considerable inconvenience to you, and for that I am sorry. Unfortunately I feel that my colleagues and I have few other options remaining to us to make clear to the government our concerns.

I have spent a good deal of time this term impressing on your children the importance of learning. It is that value which keeps me teaching each day, and which drives me to provide the best possible lessons I can for your children. I frequently appreciate the value that you as families also place on learning and the work which we undertake in school. Sadly, such support has not been felt from the national government.

Pay is rarely a draw in teaching. Few teachers would rate its importance in choosing their careers, and frequently I am told by parents and others that no amount of money would bring them into the profession. Nevertheless, like all other professions, ours is feeling the squeeze. Teachers understand that in times of austerity pay rises are rare, and indeed pay freezes common. However, in the case of teachers the central government has long been able to plunder the teachers’ pension fund for its own end and now expects teachers to make up the shortfall. Or rather, to continue to top up the treasury. Tens of billions of pounds more have been paid into the teachers’ pension fund than have been paid out, yet some teachers are being asked to double their pension contributions, work for several years longer, and receive less in their pension in return.

But pay, as I say, is very rarely a key factor in a teacher’s role. Rather, most teachers I work with are keen to do as much as they can to support your children’s learning. Sadly, this too is undervalued by the current government. I will be spending my “strike day” fully engaged in work. I shall be able to dedicate time to detailed marking, feedback and target-setting for the children in my class. This is an essential part of my role, but one for which the current Education Minister does not think teachers need time. Currently teachers receive some protected time to ensure that this vital work is done. It is usually less than 3 hours per week; a small amount in the 50- or 60-hour week of the average teacher, but vital time all the same. Removing this entitlement would only worsen my ability to help your children make progress.

In addition, the government would happily see changes that removed teachers’ right to a lunch break, to demand that teachers cover lessons at short notice in subjects which they have no knowledge of, and return to spending their time on administrative tasks like collecting dinner money and filing attendance records. All of these tasks, while important to the running of our school, would only have a negative impact on the time and energy teachers have available to plan lessons and support students.

It is always difficult for a teacher to take action which they know could be detrimental to the students in their care. Equally, few employees of any sort can afford to take unpaid time off. However, on this occasion my colleagues and I have decided that the loss of pay is a sacrifice worth making to make clear our point that we wish to be supported in providing the best possible education for your children. We can only apologise for the fact that this on-going refusal of government to engage teachers and their unions has led to this action.

I shall, of course, look forward to welcoming back your children on Friday and continuing to pursue our shared goal of providing them with excellent, well-planned learning opportunities. I hope you will feel able to continue to support us in that work.

Tagged: , ,

13 thoughts on “Why I’m Striking – the letter I’d like to send to parents

  1. teachingbattleground 17 October 2013 at 4:29 am Reply

    Reblogged this on The Echo Chamber.

  2. Whatever next? 17 October 2013 at 8:20 am Reply

    Since your letter is a mixture of opinion and propaganda, rather than fact,it is a good job if teachers do keep politics out of their students and teachers’ ears. Likewise letters like this, for which another teacher could express an entirely opposite view of the government’s views, motives and actions – and be no less factually accurate than yours.

    Good to know your true colours though, so thanks for sharing them.

    • Michael Tidd 17 October 2013 at 8:44 am Reply

      Propaganda? That implies that you believe there are untrue statements in what I have written. Would you care to challenge a particular statement?

  3. Whatever next? 17 October 2013 at 9:07 am Reply

    No untruth implied, just that a particular slant is put on things that is hard to challenge because facts do not exist to challenge. eg:

    “plunder . . . for its own end”

    “this too is undervalued by the current government.”

    “the government would happily see changes that . . .”

    I do enjoy reading your posts, most of which are interesting and balanced – but there does often seem an inability of the leftwing majority amongst the teaching profession, highly intelligent that they are, to comprehend an alternative viewpoint outside their own narrow, albeit learned, prism. The more apolitical amongst the profession seem much more able to ignore the colour of the government and see positives as well as negatives, and take things on face value.

    This article implies quite bluntly that the Government do not want children to get the best education, in effect – quite clearly the opposite of their intentions whatever one thinks of their methods – which certainly aren’t faultless!

    There is also a widespread perception in society that the leftwingers refuse to recognise the need to balance our finances or the past causes of their demise, which in turn drives their motive for striking and so on. This can be why parents, or which I am one, have less sympathy than you would like for strikes – not the fact that they don’t understand the reasons for them.

    I hope this answers your question – more than happy to agree to disagree in our great free-speaking society!

    • Michael Tidd 17 October 2013 at 9:16 am Reply

      Fair enough. I make no apology for basing the letter on my opinion. I don’t see how else anyone could ever explain strike action.
      I think you’re right that many parents see austerity as justifying pay freezes. I don’t disagree there.
      You’ll notice that despite my politician tendencies, I also haven’t criticised the curriculum changes, or even PRP. Those are decisions I don’t particularly love, but which I don’t feel are damaging in the way that others are.
      I genuinely feel that the removal of rights proposed for the new STPCD about PPA, lunchtime, etc will damage my ability to do my job well. It is that sort of information that I feel doesn’t reach parents. I have tried to be very clear that money isn’t the main driver here.
      I would argue that your focus on that element suggests that you are at least as closed-minded to different views as you imagine I am.
      But I guess that’s the nature of political debate.

      • Michael Tidd 17 October 2013 at 9:17 am Reply

        Political! “Political tendencies”
        I definitely hope I don’t have any politician tendencies.

        • Whatever next? 17 October 2013 at 9:36 am

          🙂
          I had noticed you were much more soft on the New Curriculum than other commentators, fully agree there.

          nb I don’t like to think of myself of any particular political colour, but guess we all gravitate in certain directions more than we realise.

        • Michael Tidd 17 October 2013 at 9:38 am

          Soft
          I’d say verging on positive! Didn’t like the February draft but feel quite happy with finished version in most respects. But I suspect that is partly due to my changing viewpoint.

        • Whatever next? 17 October 2013 at 9:43 am

          I have also just spotted your new curric. jigsaw which looks excellent – you can have A* for that!

        • Michael Tidd 17 October 2013 at 9:47 am

          Ah, but in this world of re-sits not counting you ought only to judge my first draft… Barely worthy of a D🙂

        • Whatever next? 17 October 2013 at 9:54 am

          🙂

  4. Best frontline blogs this week 20 October 2013 at 8:06 am Reply

    […] Why I’m striking – the letter I’d like to send to parents […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: